<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google PageRank Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/</link>
	<description>Web Publisher, SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Deron Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>Looks like PR finally updated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like PR finally updated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Deron Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>@David

Obviously I don&#039;t know for sure (nor does anyone else for that matter) but from what I&#039;ve been hearing, the people that have lost some Page Rank are the ones that were selling text links on their sites and Google has penalized them manually in the system. It wasn&#039;t the normal update where they just release the new Page Rank to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David</p>
<p>Obviously I don&#8217;t know for sure (nor does anyone else for that matter) but from what I&#8217;ve been hearing, the people that have lost some Page Rank are the ones that were selling text links on their sites and Google has penalized them manually in the system. It wasn&#8217;t the normal update where they just release the new Page Rank to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>I keep hearing how pr will be updated around November or December. A lot of sites has lost some pr so Google is updating PR except that they might have a new algorithm which is slowing things down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing how pr will be updated around November or December. A lot of sites has lost some pr so Google is updating PR except that they might have a new algorithm which is slowing things down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deron Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Deron Sizemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susansuarez.com/google-pagerank-dead/#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>I think it could be a very good thing for Google to simply do away with Page Rank. Maybe people would worry more about providing something useful to the blogging community rather than spend all of their time trying to run a scam and get a high Page Rank just to sell the site for tens times what it&#039;s worth because of a green bar and a number.

The bad thing is that Page Rank as flawed as it is, is still one of the best ways to tell the quality of a website (not always obviously as many of us are still at zero and I think run good sites), but for advertisers looking to advertise on sites, it could be bad as the other systems available for them to measure a site&#039;s worth are more flawed than Page Rank, so they will be left to rely on a bunch of flawed systems to tell them what sites to advertise on which could really hurt sites and their ability to get advertisers.

I guess only time will tell what happens. I just wish they&#039;d say something one way or the other. I can see tons of Google employee&#039;s in the know just sitting behind their desk laughing at all of us because they know they hold the key to our blogging fate. lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it could be a very good thing for Google to simply do away with Page Rank. Maybe people would worry more about providing something useful to the blogging community rather than spend all of their time trying to run a scam and get a high Page Rank just to sell the site for tens times what it&#8217;s worth because of a green bar and a number.</p>
<p>The bad thing is that Page Rank as flawed as it is, is still one of the best ways to tell the quality of a website (not always obviously as many of us are still at zero and I think run good sites), but for advertisers looking to advertise on sites, it could be bad as the other systems available for them to measure a site&#8217;s worth are more flawed than Page Rank, so they will be left to rely on a bunch of flawed systems to tell them what sites to advertise on which could really hurt sites and their ability to get advertisers.</p>
<p>I guess only time will tell what happens. I just wish they&#8217;d say something one way or the other. I can see tons of Google employee&#8217;s in the know just sitting behind their desk laughing at all of us because they know they hold the key to our blogging fate. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/14 queries in 0.032 seconds using disk

Served from: susansuarez.com @ 2010-07-30 18:18:36 -->